magnifying-glass

Nafiye Yücedağ: Framing Data as Counter-Performance – A Getaway from the Ban on Tying („Koppelungsverbot”)?

Many services in the digital world are provided “for free”. Online services for free are indeed based on the idea that contracts are not concluded in reciprocity with a monetary consideration. In most cases, however, consumers will have the opportunity to use the service only after consenting to the processing of their personal data.

Ort: Weizenbaum Institute, Hardenbergstraße 32, 10623 Berlin, Room A104


Zeit: Donnerstag, 22. August 2019 15:30 Uhr bis Donnerstag, 22. August 2019 17:00 Uhr


Fellow Talk


When the company, as data creditor, aims to base its business model profitability on the processing of personal data, the obligation on the consumers’ part to provide their personal data is interconnected with other obligations under the contract. This interconnection raises the question of whether data processing for the purposes which are expressly provided under contractual requirements does not require the consent of the data subject.

By contrast, processing personal data for purposes which are not necessary for the provision of a service is only possible with the consent of the data subject, unless alternative legal grounds for processing are applicable which are independent of users’ authorization. Nevertheless, determining the threshold with regard to the processing personal data for the purposes which are necessary for the provision of a service, is highly controversial. Once the threshold is defined, the question that needs to be addressed is when the consent of the data subject can be considered to have been freely given, if the provision of the service is dependent on that consent.

Nafiye Yücedağ has been working since 2011 as a research assistant in the Civil Law chair of Istanbul University Faculty of Law.

Zur vorherigen Seite